gohcr logopa1pa2pa3pa4
Commonwealth of PennsylvaniaCommonwealth of PennsylvaniaCommonwealth of PennsylvaniaCommonwealth of PennsylvaniaCommonwealth of PennsylvaniaCommonwealth of Pennsylvania
Commonwealth of PennsylvaniaCommonwealth of PennsylvaniaEdward G. Rendell, Governor
faces of the uninsuredRx for Small BusinesssupportLegislationfaqExecutive OrdersIn the NewsResourcesmenu spacer  

In the News - Editorials | Press Releases | Speeches | Newsletters

 

Once again, prognosis for Pa. health-care progress is grim
Philadelphia Daily News
June 16, 2008

“I SAID IT before. I'll say it again.
Until state lawmakers help hundreds of thousands of Pennsylvanians without adequate health care or insurance, they should forgo their own taxpayer-financed coverage.”

“…71 percent of the state's estimated 767,000 uninsured adults (nearly 140,000 in Philadelphia) have jobs and pay taxes. Gov. Ed, a year and a half ago, proposed insurance for those in need as part of a broad initiative, Prescription for Pennsylvania.”

“…the Democratic House in March passed a bill to cover 273,000 uninsured adults within five years, funded by various state sources and federal Medicaid dollars, committing $1.1 billion annually by 2013. But the Republican Senate has other plans…”

“Except that it [Senate proposal] does less (than the Democratic plan) for more (people). It offers care, not insurance, at clinics, to be funded through tax credits to businesses that volunteer to support the clinics. It also calls for a voluntary physicians' program.”

“When I mention to Erickson that GOP leaders declined the offer of a joint focus on health care, he says, As far as I know, that's correct. Well, as far as I know, there's no excuse for not working together to combine elements of various proposals, share the credit and offer something to the uninsured. It's the right thing to do and saves everyone with insurance…”


To fix health care, focus on uninsured
Allentown Morning Call
June 15, 2008

“Where does the debate to improve Pennsylvania's health-care system begin? Does it start with controlling hospital infections, helping to retain doctors and improving medical technology? Or does it start with making sure as many Pennsylvanians as possible have health insurance that's affordable?”

“Ideally, it's all of these things.”

“We'd like to see the state improve medical technology, help hospitals do better at controlling infections and provide physicians more reasons to stay here. All that is intended to provide Pennsylvanians with a better health care system. But, if lower-income Pennsylvanians can't afford health insurance, having a better health system means nothing.”

“When Gov. Ed Rendell first proposed his ''Cover All Pennsylvanians'' plan, he wanted to insure an estimated 800,000 uninsured Pennsylvanians. House members compromised on a more affordable number -- proposing to extend coverage to 270,000 uninsured Pennsylvanians over the next five years.

“…what did Senate Republicans propose last week? Essentially, charity, volunteers and tax breaks.”

“The Republicans estimate they can help 159,000 Pennsylvanians with all of this, but we don't see how. It will take time to create any of these systems and more time for any of them to have a meaningful impact. It's a scattershot approach that seems more intended to appeal to a variety of interest groups rather than to fix a well-defined and undeniable problem -- the inability of hundreds of thousands of Pennsylvanians to afford medical care.”

“The plan approved by the House is more expensive but it isn't a giveaway. It establishes a sliding scale for premiums that the uninsured would have to pay depending on financial ability. And, it focuses primarily on the uninsured. That's what the Senate should be doing.”



Second opinion: The Senate health plan is built on optimism
Pittsburg Post-Gazette
June 15, 2008

“Pennsylvania's Access to Basic Care health plan is a winning hand, and what we've seen in a competing bid announced last week by Senate Republicans can't trump it.”

“Senate Bill 5, sponsored by Sen. Edwin B. Erickson of Delaware County, would allocate $50 million in grants to community health-care clinics that treat the working poor. The Republicans say that could mean basic care for 175,000 new patients and take pressure off hospital emergency rooms. Left unanswered is where those people would go if they need diagnostic tests, specialty care or surgery, among the most expensive of medical services. In addition, 10 percent of the funding is projected to come from tax credits for businesses that donate to the clinics, which seems optimistic.”

“We prefer the Pennsylvania ABC plan, adapted by House Democrats from an earlier iteration of Gov. Ed Rendell's and already passed by the House. It would cost more, with funding from a tax increase on tobacco products, but it would give comprehensive health insurance to 217,000 adults who don't have it now.”

“The Democratic plan is built on that proven program, and it would be funded by real dollars, not goodwill. That's the health care plan to bet on.”
 



Health care plan no prescription
Scranton Times Tribune
June 14, 2008

“Whatever the flaws might be in the Rendell administration’s plan to expand health care coverage for low-income Pennsylvanians, it would, at least, be certain to expand coverage.”

“A centerpiece of the GOP proposal, for example, would fund tax credits for businesses that contribute to free health clinics. Such clinics are an important part of the health-care safety net, and rewarding entities that help to fund them is a good idea. Business tax credits, however, should not be mistaken for comprehensive insurance coverage, which should be the object of the exercise.”

“And now, with the Pennsylvania Health Care Cost Containment Council reporting substantial increases in uncompensated care being provided by hospitals amid a sour economy, hospitals and patients alike would be better served by broader provision of actual health care coverage.”

“Despite the GOP proposal’s good elements, overall it indicates that many politicians aren’t ready to meet the challenge.”



Ill will in Senate health plan:
Put 'HealthNet' out of its, and our, misery

Philadelphia Daily News
June 16, 2008

“THE SMARTEST LAW that the Pennsylvania General Assembly could pass will never see the light of day, since no one would have the nerve to introduce it: that would be to impose a six-month freeze on the gold-plated health plan that legislators get.”

“Last week, the Republican-controlled Senate unveiled a plan called "HealthNet" that attempts to solve the health-care crisis by setting up health clinics to serve the uninsured. The clinics would be funded by donations from businesses - which would get tax credits for their largesse - and be run by volunteer doctors and other health-care professionals. In exchange, those professionals could skip their ongoing education.”

“This let-them-eat-cake exercise is the Senate's answer to nearly 1 million uninsured people. Which is like deciding that we're going to feed every hungry person in the state from donated canned goods, or clothe everyone in the state by establishing sewing circles. All deliver the same results: unnutritious, inconsistent fare, and, in the long run, a cure far worse than the disease.”

“This is the Senate's alternative to a House bill passed in March that would provide affordable health insurance to small businesses and the uninsured. The latest Senate version, which should really be called "Health Not," would leave those federal funds on the table.”

“Despite the value of the House bill, both House and Senate fall far short of the Governor's effort to reform health care. Five years ago, Rendell established the Office of Health Care Reform, which has spent those years wrestling with one of the more challenging problems facing the country. Ours came up with a proposal to cover all Pennsylvanians, targeting the poor and low-wage workers who are uninsured.”

“Measuring that plan against the cobbled-together and inadequate response from the Senate is enough to make us sick. The tragedy is that Health Net is likely to have that real effect on too many real people.”
 


Poor Pennsylvanians need access to care
Allentown Morning Call
April 29, 2008

“More than a year ago, Gov. Ed Rendell made access to health care a major issue in this state with his ''Cover All Pennsylvanians'' proposal. Since then, the fact that tens of millions of Americans lack health insurance has become a major issue in the presidential race, too.

“However, little has changed either in the state or the nation. Hundreds of thousands of Pennsylvanians live day-to-day without health insurance, hoping to stay healthy because they can't afford to get sick. Meanwhile, state lawmakers can't agree on either the scope of health care reform, its cost, or how to pay for it.”

“It's important to note that of the current $1.35 the state collects on each pack of cigarettes, 25 cents goes to subsidize the malpractice insurance system (MCare) for Pennsylvania physicians. Stabilizing the high cost of malpractice insurance has been crucial to stem the tide of physicians leaving the state. But Gov. Rendell wants to tap the growing MCare surplus to help pay for extending coverage to uninsured Pennsylvanians. There is some irony is a proposal to help extend health insurance to uninsured Pennsylvanians would target a program designed to make sure there are enough doctors in the state to provide that care. But Gov. Rendell has turned that around by asking why lawmakers were able justifying taxing tobacco users to help doctors but can't find the political will to do the same to help uninsured Pennsylvanians.

“This shouldn't be about political posturing. It should be about figuring out how best to provide for the least fortunate and most vulnerable and working class Pennsylvanians who can't afford health insurance. It should be figuring out practical and fair funding solutions to keep Pennsylvania healthy.”

“…the Republican caucus is trying to line up arguments to shoot it down. That process starts tomorrow in a hearing of the Senate Policy Committee. So far, only members of the business community, hospitals and medical community and the insurance industry have been invited to testify. What these groups have to say about the costs and consequences of extending health coverage to the uninsured certainly is relevant. But it's not all that needs to be considered. There's another group of shareholders in this debate that need to be heard from -- Pennsylvanians who need health care and can't afford to get it. Unfortunately for them, they can't afford to hire lobbyists to argue on their behalf.”

“…it's not fair to uninsured Pennsylvanians, nor wise public policy, for state lawmakers to wait and see what happens on the national stage regarding universal health care. The legislators were elected to be leaders and the Senate should lead by extending health insurance coverage to as many Pennsylvanians as they can.”


Health-care stalemate must end
Erie Times
April 10, 2008

“Politics is often defined by conflict. Many Pennsylvanians even relish a healthy political battle. But state Senate Republicans are playing with fire on health care -- the kind that could cost you your favorite doctor or specialist if a stalemate over malpractice insurance isn't resolved soon.

“The issue involves a complex blend of politics. But simply put, once Senate leaders declined to act either on Rendell's "Cover All Pennsylvanians" or the state House's less ambitious plan to cover 220,000 more working-age uninsured individuals, a health-care standoff over helping doctors pay malpractice insurance began.

“The House bill is called Pennsylvania Access to Basic Care. It would cover 222,000 Pennsylvanians ages 19 to 64 who don't have health insurance. The existing adult basic plan would include 53,174 enrollees. Some would pay a premium for coverage depending on their incomes.

“This legislation would also fund an extension of the MCare abatement over 10 years that would invest $3.3 billion more to help doctors pay for malpractice insurance. But Senate leaders, complaining how the House bill would be funded, won't bring it up for a vote.

This means the state's physicians must come up with malpractice payments that range from $1,500 a year for primary care physicians to $15,000 annually for high-risk specialists such as orthopedic surgeons and obstetricians.

“But that's the bill on the table. That's the political reality right now. It's just as appropriate to point out that Senate leaders are the ones putting patients, the uninsured and physicians in the middle of this political stalemate.”


Malpractice: Senate Republicans are blocking health care
Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
April 08, 2008

“Now it's up to the Senate to approve Senate Bill 1137, which would break the stalemate over malpractice subsidies and significantly expand access to free or low-cost health insurance coverage. This should be as simple as getting an X-ray, but Senate Republicans oppose it for reasons that are just as transparent.

“The plan passed by the House last month, called Pennsylvania Access to Basic Care, would cover 217,000 Pennsylvanians ages 19 to 64 who don't have health insurance now. The current adultBasic plan, which has 53,174 enrollees, would be folded into the new program. Eligibility requirements are essentially the same -- applicants must have lived in the state for at least 90 days and not had health insurance for six months unless the reason is job loss. Some recipients pay a premium for coverage on a sliding scale, depending on income.

“Any question of whether there is a need for this coverage can be answered by looking at the waiting list for adultBasic, which has included 80,000 to 90,000 people for months. The need may be even greater, when you consider that some people see that long a list and decide not to bother applying.

“Currently, the state subsidizes a portion of the cost for doctors, and the fund is on track to have a $504 million surplus by the end of June. Of that, $246 million would be directed to the ABC program. The rest would be used to phase out the malpractice program, including coverage of the unfunded liability of future malpractice claims.

“But the real threat to this bill comes from Senate Republicans. They say they don't like the cost, and they've made a disingenuous claim that Democrats haven't said how they'll pay for the program.

“That's because there's a $120 million annual gap in funding, which, not coincidentally, is the amount that would be raised by tobacco tax increases previously proposed by Mr. Rendell. But the House Democrats' proposal doesn't spell that out.

“Pennsylvanians want health care coverage. The state Senate should stop being an obstacle and deliver it to thousands of them.”


Editorial: Malpractice Subsidy
Health care on hold
Philadelphia Inquirer
April 05, 2008

“Thousands of Pennsylvania doctors have been shown to a seat in the waiting room next to the state's nearly 800,000 uninsured adults. Maybe together they can get better attention from the Republican-led state Senate.

“Physicians and the uninsured have a shared stake in seeing the end of an apparent grudge match that has Senate leaders blocking Gov. Rendell's efforts to expand health care for poor and low-paid Pennsylvanians.

 “The smaller House-approved health plan more than met Republican concerns over cost. It also provided incentives for small businesses to offer insurance to lower-wage workers, and embraced the GOP's core proposal for medical savings accounts, which would enable individuals to purchase high-deductible health-care policies. Another progressive proposal from the House would assure that health insurers could not turn away people due to medical histories.

“From the physicians' perspective, there's even more at stake since the House also approved a generous extension of the MCare abatement. Over a 10-year period, the state would bestow $3.3 billion more in aid to help doctors cover malpractice insurance costs.

“Rather than debate the workable House plan authored by Rep. Todd Eachus (D., Luzerne), though, senators sent the House a stopgap proposal for a one-year renewal of MCare.

“Doctors should find it odd that Senate leaders still are being supported by the Pennsylvania Medical Society and the hospitals' trade group.

“With billions more in aid being offered to them, physicians have to be asking themselves why their mouthpieces are taking the wrong side in this health-care reform debate.”


Physicians, needy Pennsylvanians deserve better than this Mcare deadlock
Allentown Morning Call
April 03, 2008

“The state Legislature delivered another of its maddening, do-nothing, fumble-the-ball performances this week regarding the fund that helps physicians pay for malpractice insurance. As a result, the fund lapsed on Tuesday and the Pennsylvania Medical Society told its members to expect to start paying more.

“It still is possible that the Senate will adopt a plan already passed in the House on March 17 that would preserve the fund for 10 years while connecting it to Gov. Rendell's plan to cover more working-poor Pennsylvanians. But for now, that isn't happening.

“Money for the MCare fund comes from a 25 cent-per-pack cigarette tax and a surcharge on traffic tickets. In recent years, the fund has had a surplus, and it has been growing.

“Our greater concern is for the 220,000 people who can't afford insurance and who would have been covered by Gov. Rendell's plan. Mr. Rendell showed a willingness to compromise in January when he scaled back his health-care plan and removed a major stumbling block, a proposed payroll tax. He changed the funding stream for ABC by increasing the cigarette tax, adding a new tax on chewing tobacco and tapping the MCare fund. Mr. Rendell made the point at the time, ''How is it okay to raise the cigarette tax for the doctors but we won't raise it to get the working poor health care?'

“Good question. Gov. Rendell has been willing in the past to use brinksmanship with the Legislature, and bigger challenges on passing the 2007-2008 budget are looming. He probably could extend the MCare fund by executive order, but why should he? He offered the Legislature a viable program to serve both the needs of physicians by extending the fund and the needs of Pennsylvanians who can't afford insurance. The Senate should pass it.”


Small businesses & health care (Op-Ed)
Philadelphia Daily News
April 02, 2008

“NOBODY will benefit more from HB 2005, the health-insurance reform bill now wending its way through the state Legislature, than the commonwealth's small businesses.

Yet the official lobbyists in Harrisburg for small business - the Chamber of Commerce and the National Federation of Independent Businesses - are fighting to block it.

“These so-called "representatives of business" don't actually represent most small businesses in the state. And what's worse - and this is the dirty little secret of health-care lobbying in Pennsylvania - the leaders of these organizations are fighting insurance reform out of their own self-interest, not out of a concern for their own members.

“The chamber and NFIB provide health insurance to their members. Indeed, a chunk of their budgets comes from this. The reforms contained in the bill - which would protect small businesses and consumers - will cut into their profits.

“The Health Insurance Reform Bill will help small businesses and individuals buy affordable health insurance in many ways.

“Many owners of small businesses like ours want to provide health insurance for our employees both because it's the right thing to do and because we know that providing the insurance makes good business sense.

“The bill will enable small businesses like ours to provide insurance to our employees. Every small business in the state will benefit. So it's time we small business owners stand up and speak out. Maybe we can drown out the voices of those who claim to speak in our name while only standing up for themselves.”


Use of liability fund surplus would help uninsured 
Shamokin News
March 24, 2008

“For the past five years, Pennsylvanians have helped to reduce physicians’ costs and maintain access to medical care by steering hundreds of millions of tax dollars into a fund that covers a portion of doctors’ liability insurance.

“Because of an improved liability environment, that fund now has a substantial surplus. It’s reasonable and fair to use a portion of that surplus to address another major health care issue: the high number of uninsured, low-income workers in the state.

“The fund, which is fueled by a 25-cents-per-pack tax on cigarettes, now has a $400 million surplus.

“This past week, the House passed a bill that would use part of that surplus to provide basic health care coverage for about 270,000 low-income working adults who cannot afford private insurance.

“Using the surplus would not jeopardize the premium subsidies for physicians, which have been extended by the Legislature on a year-to-year basis since the original passage of the program.

“But the overall health care system would benefit, as well. Coverage for uninsured workers would sharply reduce the amount of uncompensated care now provided by hospitals and other providers, thus improving their bottom lines.

“The Senate should approve the House bill. The issue, just as it was when the physicians’ premium subsidies were at issue, is broad access to medical care.”


Pa. Health Care Out in the cold
The Philadelphia Inquirer
January 28, 2008

"But while many in Washington are talking about health care, Gov. Rendell has put forth a smart and workable plan to provide health-care coverage for nearly 800,000 uninsured Pennsylvanians.

"Even better, the plan seems fiscally sound, and is financed in a way that won't kill taxpayers.

"So what's the holdup on Rendell's plan?

"Talk to your legislators. Especially the ones with the Rs after their name.

"Lawmakers have had more than a year to consider the signature piece of Rendell's sweeping ‘Prescription for Pennsylvania’ plan.

"OK. Does anyone have a better plan? If so, let's see it. If not, voters should lobby their lawmakers for Rendell's plan. It's a winner for the uninsured, the insured, businesses and hospitals.

"And it only costs smokers a dime."


Rendell changes tactics, improves health care bills
Towanda Sunday Review
January 27, 2008

"Despite his reputation for playing hardball in order to cut deals, Gov. Ed Rendell has lobbed a big, fat softball at the medical community in an effort to expand the state’s health care coverage of low-income workers.

"The Legislature should pass the package prior to the March 31 expiration of the program that benefits physicians."


Improved 'Cover All Pennsylvanians' plan deserves Legislature's support
The Allentown Morning Call
January 23, 2008

"Now, a month later, the second half of this legislative session is under way and Gov. Rendell's plan is back in the spotlight. Last year, we had reservations about how the state would pay for the very important goal of helping part-time and low-wage employees get health coverage. The Governor's current plan addresses those concerns. With one relatively small question about what will happen in the out-years of Gov. Rendell's 10-year program, "Cover All Pennsylvanians" deserves to be enacted.

"The big change that the governor made at the end of last year was to remove a payroll tax that would have collected funds from employers to cover almost 800,000 uninsured adults in Pennsylvania. Instead, he would raise the cigarette tax by 10 cents a pack and enact a new tax on cigars, chewing tobacco and snuff, products whose sale is taxed in every other state. Last year, 71 percent of Pennsylvanians in a Quinnipiac University poll said they favor raising tobacco taxes to pay for health care."


Pa. can lead by example | Rendell revises plan for uninsured citizens
(Pittsburgh Post-Gazette) — in The Tribune-Democrat
January 22, 2008

"Last year, Gov. Ed Rendell devised a way to provide coverage for Pennsylvanians who lack health insurance, and now he’s found a better way to pay for it.

"The help that the governor has been proposing in his Cover All Pennsylvanians plan is an attempt to do what the federal government has failed to accomplish, and the revamped version is an improvement over his original initiative.

"...Rendell’s initiative is a more direct remedy for an ailment that afflicts Pennsylvania and the rest of the nation.

"Pennsylvania now has an opportunity to help its uninsured citizens and to lead the nation by example."


Tweaking the system to cover health care for all in the state may be possible, but hardly probable
The Patriot News
January 17, 2008

"Gov. Ed Rendell made another pitch this week in behalf of his health insurance proposal, "Cover All Pennsylvanians," which is aimed at insuring the estimated 767,000 adults in Pennsylvania who lack coverage.

"Behind the numbers, as the governor sought to demonstrate, are real people facing real difficulties trying to gain affordable access to the health care they or their family members require.

"In short, the system is in crisis. Anyone who fails to recognize that must be living on another planet.

"The uninsured are large in number but unorganized. The defenders of the status quo are relatively few but powerful and influential. Guess who is going to win this battle again this year."


Use MCare surplus to insure 70[0],000
Citizen’s Voice
December 9, 2007

"...Someone always pays for treatment of the uninsured. Insured workers face higher premiums; indirect taxes rise and health-care institutions charge more to paying customers to cover the costs. In the long run, establishing better coverage for low-income workers would improve the health care system in terms of quality and cost. Insured people generally are healthier than the uninsured because they seek treatment sooner, before conditions become acute and acutely expensive to treat. And broad coverage will help the health-system become more stable, financially.

"Lawmakers should address health care access as a systemic matter and approve the plan to broaden that access to as many workers as possible."


Ratings, standardized benefits worth a look from legislators
The Patriot-News
August 7, 2007

"Lobbyists for Pennsylvania’s businesses have vigorously opposed Gov. Ed Rendell’s plan to tax the payrolls of companies that don’t offer insurance to their employees, though you have to wonder if that truly reflects the view of the great majority of businesses that do pay to insure their employees."


Rendell’s Health-Care Plan; Recovering nicely
The Philadelphia Inquirer
August 6, 2007

"Just a few months ago, the first components of Gov. Rendell’s sweeping health-care proposal appeared to be on life support… So it was a minor miracle that the governor the other week had a pen poised above legislation for the infections and expanded-care measures. With the stroke of that pen, Rendell put the state in the forefront of efforts o safeguard patients from infections, expand access to care, and begin to stem the rise of medical costs… As big as those steps are, the effort to plug gaps in the health insurance safety net is even more important. Rendell’s “Cover All Pennsylvanians” plan would alleviate personal suffering, improve productivity, and reduce health-care costs."


Workplace Smoking Ban; Loopholes in the law will cost lives
The Philadelphia Inquirer
June 19, 2007

"It's hard to get around the fact that the us surgeon general says neither ventilation nor no-smoking areas can isolate patrons from secondhand smoke, which contains dozens of known carcinogens.

"Any talk of watering down the smoking ban makes no sense from a health perspective- and that’s what should guide this debate. No one in the General Assembly should cast a vote that, in effect, attempts to protect some citizens' health but not that of others."


Erie Times-News
Better health worth higher tax
May 6, 2007

"Smoking literally costs Pennsylvania a fortune. So a major tactic in Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell’s Prescription for Pennsylvania health-care-reform package is a statewide ban on smoking in publicand work spaces. But Rendell also wants the state Legislature to wield more weapons in the commonwealth’s necessary offensive against smoking. He is calling for higher tobacco taxes to help raise $151 million to improve health care in Pennsylvania. This is a long-overdue revenue broadside against a deadly public-health hazard."


Ben Waxman, student at Juniata College
The Patriot-News
March 1, 2007

"According to the U.S. Census, 72 percent of all 18- to 25-year- olds lack health insurance. Medical bills are one of the leading reasons that young people drop out of college. Juggling school, work and family without health care is simply too difficult for many students.

"In addition, many jobs held by young adults have low wages and lousy benefits. A recent report from Demos Foundation found that young people face a number of serious economic challenges. The average college student graduates with more than $20,000 worth of debt. The spiraling cost of living, which includes medical expenses, makes it harder and harder for young adults to make ends meet.

"Young people are not always the most effective lobbyists, but that doesn’t mean we should be ignored. Health care coverage is an incredibly important issue and any reforms will have a major impact on my generation. If political leaders want to make Pennsylvania more competitive, they will address this."


Alan Sager and Deborah Socolar, directors of the Health Refrom Program at Boston University School of Public Health
The Sunday Patriot-News
February 25, 2007

"Most politicians offer only rhetorical cost controls for fear of offending powerful caregiver groups. Rendell goes further.

"He usefully proposes that insurers must devote at least 85 percent of small-business premiums to care, thereby cutting marketing, profit and administration.

"Affordable health care is in reach. Current spending – about $110 billion this year in Pennsylvania – can pay for the care that works for all who need it."


Rendell plan is worth a look
Centre Daily Times
February 4, 2007

"And Gov. Rendell recently unveiled his “Prescription for Pennsylvania,” which, if embraced and adopted by the General Assembly, would make private health insurance available for everyone in the state while, if its projections are accurate, reducing the costs.

"While saving the details for a future editorial, there is much to like in Rendell’s plan. It is not, he insists, a “big government program” funded solely by state money supported by endless levels of bureaucracy. Nor is it a single-payer plan. It builds upon the current system of private company-provided health insurance."


Concept is laudable; delivery will be key
Reading Eagle
January 28, 2007

"Since Gov. Ed Rendell announced his proposal for universal health-care coverage in Pennsylvania, on health-care provider after another has had pretty much the same reaction: They applaud the governor’s willingness to broach the subject and look forward to working with him to develop the final product."


The Right Rx; Not a perfect, but Rendell’s plan rightly takes
aim at soaring costs
The Patriot-News
January 21, 2007

"While there will be those who believe Rendell’s “Prescription for Pennsylvania” plan goes too far or not far enough, it strikes us as a worthy effort. It seeks to build on the existing system’s strengths, while addressing some of its weaknesses. It doesn’t seek to reinvent the wheel, a surefire recipe for political deadlock.

"With advice and suggestions from a broad range of stakeholders, Rendell and his health advisor, Rosemarie Greco, have offered a proposal that is eminently doable. Its success or failure will depend on whether legislators are prepared to grapple with an extremely complex issue in a straight-forward manner, weathering what could be an unparalleled lobbying effort by some special interests to protect their own interests at the cost of the greater good."


Health Care in Pa: Greater than the parts, if the parties agree
Philadelphia Inquirer
January 21, 2007

"The state’s leadership on providing health insurance for kids – just expanded last year to cover every child – is a good omen for Rendell’s broader health reform. Given a growing national clamor for reform, it’s also the right moment to try to make health care accessible and affordable for every grown-up."


John M. Baer
Here’s to your health: Ed's ‘prescription’ should be filled
Philadelphia Daily News
January 18, 2007

"With the boldest, most comprehensive proposal of his incumbency, Gov. Ed is looking to change the face of health care in Pennsylvania… His proposals unquestionably are good ideas for the health of the state and the head of the state."